School Year Completed
MSD Lawrence Township · FY 25–26 · school year
Enrollments by program this school year
6 total enrollments · using 2 of 5 programs
Your enrollment vs the tier median, by program
Across 4 other Metro-tier districts with students enrolled in Supplemental
Across 2 other Metro-tier districts with students enrolled in AP · small sample, may be noisy
2 peers enroll; you have none this FY
Statewide median among 14 districts running Academy; you have none this FY
Statewide median among 4 districts running FlexEd; you have none this FY
Top Subjects by Enrollment
3 subjects · 0 growing · 2 declining · net -11 enrollments YoY
Top Courses by Enrollment
All 5 courses
Enrollment Trend
Light User · Metro tier Light User · Metro tier MSD Lawrence Township · by FY 25–26 IO enrollments Power Usertop 25% of tier Active Usermiddle 50% Light Userbottom 25% Non-Adopterno IO enrollments Quartiles of Metro-tier IO adopters by enrollmentSchool year enrollments — vs same-level peers within the Metro tier
Same-level cohort too small for a meaningful median — comparing instead vs 3 Metro-tier adopters (all levels). Tier also includes: 1 Power · 2 Active.
Adoption Density
IO enrollments per 100 ADM students — penetration normalized for district size
0.0 IO enrollments per 100 students (6 of 15,927 ADM in FY 25–26). Adoption density normalizes for district size, so a small district at high penetration ranks honestly against a large district with the same per-student rate.
Indiana Online